Ferry opposition grows
The Ettalong Reaction Group has decided to pursue their opposition to the fast ferry through the Environmental Defenders Office and the State Ombudsman.
It was standing room only in the Ettalong Progress Hall as more than 100 local residents, fishermen and members of community groups attended the public meeting on April 14 to discuss the fast ferry proposal.
Under the umbrella of the Ettalong Ratepayers Association, the group heard the sometimes hostile arguments both for and against the fast ferry and its possible impact on the region.
According to Chairperson Mr Rob Molin, the group "was not against the principle of a service from the Central Coast but in a sensible, environmentally-friendly location with close access to the open sea".
Ettalong was basically shallow sand banks, if these were removed the whole environment would change, he said.
A letter from residents requesting an independent EIS had been sent to Gosford Council. This was resoundingly supported by the meeting.
Local fisherman Mr Warren Campbell claimed: "A boat this size will dredge its own channel and the sea bed will be drastically altered."
This notion was backed by Mr Ian James representing the Commercial Fishing Association.
Mr James cited correspondence received from NSW Fisheries that the ferry proposal would adversely effect the "small but scattered seagrass that provides for many juveniles".
NSW Fisheries had required a $20,000 bond for potential damage the ferry may cause to fish stocks.
Concern was also expressed at the potential impact on both the prawn and oyster industries.
There was further discussion with regard to parking and increased traffic impact in the immediate vicinity of the proposed ferry wharf.
A possible utilisation of the nearby netball courts to provide a parking facility was dismissed when an adamant Margaret Toombs of the Netball Association stated: "There is no way we are losing our netball courts."
Concern was also voiced over a higher number of tourist coaches to meet the ferry and the consequent increase in traffic flow, which local roads are not designed to manage.
Issues of safety for ferry passengers and recreational craft and the loss of the Ettalong foreshore were raised; as well as the more positive notion that ferry service would provide stimulation to the Peninsula economy.
The meeting concluded with the formalisation of the concerned residents group.
The date for the next meeting of the group is to be advised, all inquiries 4342 4511.