Phone 4342 2070 Fax 4342 2071 Email us

2002 (c) Peninsula Community Access Newspaper Inc

 

Seeing the other side

 

In regard to the various letters to the editor about cycle ways-shared pathways, I find it very interesting how people can become so dogmatic in their own view and not see the other side.

One letter talks about the outstanding presentations from those opposing the cycle ways, it doesn't acknowledge the outstanding presentations in favour of the cycle ways at the same meeting.

Another states "those of us who attended the meeting of rate payers were amazed".

The writer ignored those attending who were in favour.

Another letter talks of doctrinaire arguments put forward by myself and others.

The nature of cycle ways-shared pathways is that they will attract people in wheelchairs, on bicycles, skates and walking frames and that will be a practical outcome.

I find it hard to believe that this outcome isn't regarded as a positive.

To get people out of their incredibly damaging private cars, we need pleasant fun places for cyclists, as well as routes alongside roads.

The more people we get on their feet and on their bicycles, the less concrete we will need in the future, and more money will be available for other needs of the community.

I can understand how those opposed to a concrete cycle way-path way do not want change to their grass reserve, but I cannot understand how they cannot see the benefits.

The Point Clare to West Gosford cycle way is a shining example of community benefits.

Another example is at Tuggerah Lakes where people take their families to the cycle way just for the chance to cycle in a pleasant environment.

Who do I represent?

On this issue, I represent those in the community who believe we should have cycle ways-shared footpaths in these locations.

Are they not acknowledged as being a part of the community?

Cr Geoff Preece